feat: remove legacy alert rules, superseded by automations

Alert rules already auto-migrate into automations on boot and the old
engine stands down after. Deletes the rule/firing tables, routes, UI,
and AI tools; keeps notification channels since automations still use
them. Also fixes automations' notify step, which still called the
deleted repository.
This commit is contained in:
LukeGus committed 2026-09-22 10:45:12 -05:00
1 parent e0f14f2ecf
commit e372b0eda7
101 files changed
+29118 -5539

No files matched your search

+2 -2
View File
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@ const BASE = { hostCount: 3, allowReadOnlyCommands: false };
describe("buildSystemPrompt", () => {
it("tells the assistant to stay inside what was asked", () => {
// Without these the assistant answered "what is running on this server"
// by also proposing a monitoring script and an alert rule nobody wanted.
// by also proposing a monitoring script and an automation nobody wanted.
const prompt = buildSystemPrompt(BASE);
expect(prompt).toContain("nothing beyond it");
expect(prompt).toMatch(/Read, then report\. Do not propose anything\./);
expect(prompt).toMatch(/no monitoring, no alert rules, no scripts/);
expect(prompt).toMatch(/no monitoring automations, no scripts/);
expect(prompt).toMatch(/One request means one proposal at most/);
});
@@ -13,14 +13,12 @@ const snippetRepository = {
deleteSnippet: vi.fn(),
};
const fleetRepository = { create: vi.fn(), addMember: vi.fn() };
const alertRepository = { createAlertRule: vi.fn() };
const automationRepository = { create: vi.fn() };
vi.mock("../../../../database/repositories/factory.js", () => ({
createCurrentHostRepository: () => hostRepository,
createCurrentSnippetRepository: () => snippetRepository,
createCurrentFleetRepository: () => fleetRepository,
createCurrentAlertRepository: () => alertRepository,
createCurrentAutomationRepository: () => automationRepository,
}));
@@ -1,86 +0,0 @@
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
/**
* Once the alert rules have been migrated into automations, both systems hold
* a copy of every rule. If the old engine kept evaluating, every alert would
* be delivered twice.
*/
const listEnabledRulesForHost = vi.fn();
const listEnabledRulesForHostUser = vi.fn();
const createFiring = vi.fn();
vi.mock("../../../database/repositories/factory.js", () => ({
createCurrentAlertRepository: () => ({
listEnabledRulesForHost,
listEnabledRulesForHostUser,
createFiring,
pruneFiringsOlderThan: vi.fn(),
listEnabledChannelsForRule: vi.fn(async () => []),
findRuleById: vi.fn(async () => null),
getHostDisplayName: vi.fn(async () => "host"),
}),
}));
vi.mock("../../../utils/logger.js", () => ({
statsLogger: { warn: vi.fn(), info: vi.fn(), error: vi.fn() },
}));
vi.mock("../../../utils/notification-sender.js", () => ({
sendNotification: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}));
vi.mock("../../../utils/discord-sender.js", () => ({
sendDiscord: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}));
const alertEngineModule =
await import("../../../../../plugins/host-metrics/backend/alert-engine.js");
const cpuRule = {
id: 1,
userId: "user-1",
hostId: null,
name: "CPU",
enabled: true,
triggerType: "cpu_threshold",
thresholdValue: 50,
thresholdDurationSeconds: 0,
cooldownMinutes: 0,
};
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks();
listEnabledRulesForHost.mockResolvedValue([cpuRule]);
listEnabledRulesForHostUser.mockResolvedValue([cpuRule]);
});
describe("AlertEngine before migration", () => {
it("still evaluates rules", async () => {
expect(alertEngineModule.isAlertEngineSuperseded()).toBe(false);
await alertEngineModule.AlertEngine.getInstance().evaluateMetrics(7, {
cpu: { percent: 90 },
});
expect(listEnabledRulesForHost).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
describe("AlertEngine after migration", () => {
it("stops evaluating every trigger type", async () => {
alertEngineModule.markAlertEngineSuperseded();
expect(alertEngineModule.isAlertEngineSuperseded()).toBe(true);
const engine = alertEngineModule.AlertEngine.getInstance();
await engine.evaluateMetrics(7, { cpu: { percent: 99 } });
await engine.evaluateStatus(7, false);
await engine.evaluateHealthCheck(7, "user-1", "web", false);
await engine.evaluateUserLogin(7, "user-1", "root", "10.0.0.1");
// Nothing is even loaded, so nothing can be delivered a second time.
expect(listEnabledRulesForHost).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(listEnabledRulesForHostUser).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(createFiring).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ const route = ast.statements.find(
);
if (!route) throw new Error("Login event route is missing");
const notify = vi.fn();
const legacy = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined);
let handler: (req: unknown, res: unknown) => Promise<void>;
runInNewContext(
ts.transpileModule(route.getText(ast), {
@@ -49,7 +48,6 @@ runInNewContext(
},
}),
notifyAutomationInternalEvent: notify,
AlertEngine: { getInstance: () => ({ evaluateUserLogin: legacy }) },
},
);
const body = {
@@ -61,7 +59,7 @@ const body = {
const response = () => ({ status: vi.fn().mockReturnThis(), json: vi.fn() });
beforeEach(() => vi.clearAllMocks());
it("delivers successful SSH login details to automations while retaining the legacy hook", async () => {
it("delivers successful SSH login details to automations", async () => {
const res = response();
await handler(
{
@@ -75,12 +73,6 @@ it("delivers successful SSH login details to automations while retaining the leg
sshUser: "alice",
fromIp: "192.0.2.4",
});
expect(legacy).toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith(
42,
"owner",
"alice",
"192.0.2.4",
);
expect(res.json).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ ok: true });
});
@@ -101,6 +93,5 @@ it.each([
);
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(403);
expect(notify).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(legacy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
},
);